However, when the host kicked Overthrow off its server a couple of weeks ago, I was concerned that this report might become lost forever. Consequently, I captured the cached version, archived it here, and sat on it, waiting to see if the Overthrow site would be completely resurrected.
And to date, the site has not been completely resurrected. Since it is uncertain when Bill White will completely resurrect the site in its fulness, and restore all the old reports, I am re-posting the original essay, along with pertinent links and an analysis of the information (note that Bill White never posted a source link in the original).
Whites Have Bigger Cocks Than Blacks
Scientific Study Proves It
7/10/2005 7:21:13 PM
Discuss this story in the forum
Science -- A scientific study has proven that white men have bigger cocks than blacks, despite lies about black sexuality perpetrated in Jewish mass media and pornography.
According to the study, published in a Canadian scientific journal, white men's average cock length is 6.4", two tenths of an inch longer than black cocks, which are an average of 6.2" long. Hispanic cocks are an average 6" long, and East Asian cocks are an average of 5.6" long.
For decades, whites have had to listen to the insulting and false derision of Jewish propaganda claiming that African barbarians have giant cocks that somehow make white women attracted to them. While very few white women are actually attracted to blacks, and most of those who are are mentally, emotionally, or physically defective in some way, this myth has been eagerly propagated by Jewish entertainment media, Jewish movies, Jewish music, and, most importantly, Jewish pornography.
Like all Jewish myths about black "superiority", such as alleged black musical ability, alleged black dancing ability, alleged black sports ability, and alleged black entertainment ability, the myth of giant black cocks has been proven to be a racist lie designed by Jews to psychologically undermine white society.
Emailed to you by:
Libertarian Socialist News
ATTN: Bill White, Editor
Post Office Box 8631
Roanoke, VA 24014
To unsubscribe, you must go to the website and fill out the form in the upper left hand corner -- the one that says "unsubscribe".
Commentary: It is questionable whether there is a consistent correlation between race and penis size. A Google web search of the phrase "race+penis size" reveals that different surveys and references yield different results.
According to Sizesurvey.com, their findings support Bill White's conclusion:
Since the release of the fifth edition, the number of Black and Hispanic participants has not substantially increased. Because of the continued low sample sizes therefore, the results reported below concerning the aforementioned groups must be considered tentative, pending a larger number of responses.
Surprisingly, it would appear from Figure 5 (posted above left), that contrary to popular myth, Black males have shorter erect lengths than their Caucasian counterparts. However, due to the small sample size and large variation in lengths, this "difference" is not statistically significant. The average flaccid length among Blacks however was 93.8mm (3.7") compared to 87.7mm (3.4") for Caucasians, which may be responsible for the impression that Black men have greater erect dimensions. Again, I emphasize that these observations must remain tentative.
There was a significant difference in length between Caucasians and both Hispanic and East Asians (those of Chinese, Japanese, Korean or Vietnamese descent). Whereas with Hispanics, such a difference was limited to erect length only, with East Asians all five measurements were statistically lower in comparison to Caucasians. Although part of this difference may be due to the shorter stature of East Asians, height matched comparisons with Caucasian subjects nevertheless failed to alter this finding.
And a survey cited on the Answers.google.com website also seems to validate Bill White's conclusion. While I could not find the specific scientific journal he cited, the numbers cited below correlate precisely with what White published in the original article. Consequently, he must have been referring to Masters & Johnson:
Sex Project - sex, love, and relationships
Myths concerning males: Black men have naturally larger penises than white men.
"This couldn't be further from the truth. Based on a number of surveys (most notably Masters and Johnson), of thousands of men of many different races, white males actually have the largest penises. White males averaged an erect penis length of 6.4" while black males averaged 6.2". Hispanic men averaged 6.0" and finally east Asian men bring up the rear with a meager 5.6".
However, the Coolnurse.com website tells a different tale. According to their research, blacks are largest at 6.89 inches, followed by whites at 6.22 inches, Hispanics at 6.15 inches, and Asians at 5.33 inches.
Consequently, there is no consistent consensus on this issue. And that's precisely what Wikipedia has to say about it - no correlation. However, in a sense, this does validate one of the other points that Bill White made in his original essay - that lurid tales of black sexual prowess and black "supercocks" were clearly exaggerated. Whites may not have bigger cocks than blacks, but blacks don't have bigger cocks than whites, either.
Although Asians, for some reason, seem to come up short in nearly every survey.